America’s Reassertion of White Hegemony
The 2024 election ended not simply with Kamala Harris losing the presidency, but with a chilling affirmation of America’s deeper truths. While headlines speak of economic concerns — the rising cost of eggs, gas, mortgages, and interest rates — these are distractions from the darker forces at play. Harris’s loss was not just the result of failed messaging or poor campaign strategy; it was the culmination of a society realigning itself with the oppressive instincts that have always underpinned its identity. This election was a reassertion of white cultural hegemony, a rejection not only of progress but of the very idea of shared humanity.
For decades, America has been haunted by the specter of demographic change, particularly the anticipated Latino majority. This paranoia is more than a statistical projection; it is a psychological assault on the myth of white dominance. The policies and rhetoric that drove this election — restrictive immigration laws, anti-transgender legislation, the fetishization of “law and order” — are less about governance than about cultural preservation. They are the tools of an ideology desperate to maintain control in the face of inevitable change.
Harris’s defeat exposed this desperation in stark terms. While much has been made of the minority voters who supported Trump — 21% of Black men and 55% of Latino men, according to post-election analyses — this narrative obscures the greater truth. The majority of these communities rejected the authoritarian agenda, voting instead for Harris and what she represented. Yet, their voices were drowned out by a society eager to focus on the exceptions, weaponizing these numbers to further narratives of division. To understand this election, we must look beyond these surface-level statistics and confront the deeper forces that shape American identity.
This is not just about racism; it is about the cultural and economic systems that underpin it. The United States has always been a capitalism of cruelty, a nation built on the commodification of human lives. Its obsession with productivity has left no room for compassion. Immigrants, children, the elderly, the disabled — all are expendable in the pursuit of profit. This ethos is visible in every corner of society, from the underfunded schools that fail our children to the punitive immigration policies that devastate families. The preoccupation with limiting trans rights — targeting a population of less than 1% — is emblematic of a system that thrives on creating enemies to maintain power.
For those who support this vision of America, cruelty is not a byproduct; it is the point. It is a feature of a system designed to reinforce dominance through fear and suffering. This was never more apparent than in the policies of the Trump administration, which weaponized every aspect of governance to marginalize and punish. Trump’s America is not an anomaly; it is the natural evolution of a society that has always prioritized capital over people. His success, even after the disasters of his presidency, is a testament to the enduring appeal of that vision.
Harris’s campaign, by contrast, offered a glimpse of what could be — a nation that values equity, that recognizes the humanity of all its citizens. But such a vision demands more than policies; it demands a fundamental shift in how we understand power and community. And in 2024, America was not ready to make that leap. Instead, it retreated into the familiar embrace of dominance and exclusion.
This rejection of progress is not unique to the United States. Around the world, leaders like Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orbán have built regimes on the manipulation of democratic systems, using fear and disinformation to consolidate power. Trump is not an outlier; he is part of a global movement toward authoritarianism. These leaders have weaponized technology and media to create a reality in which facts are malleable and dissent is dangerous. Their success is a warning of what happens when societies fail to protect the vulnerable.
Yet, the election was not just a loss for Harris; it was a loss for the promise of what America could be. As a white man who voted for her, I mourn for this country. I have spent my life watching its potential squandered by greed and fear. My daughter, who died at 21 from a heroin overdose, is a tragic reminder of what happens when a society refuses to invest in its people. Even as a middle-class family, we encountered the glaring gaps in a system that values profit over lives. And as an educator, I have seen firsthand how this ethos shapes every institution, leaving children — our supposed future — without the support they need to thrive. America does not simply neglect its most vulnerable; it actively despises them, seeing them not as individuals with needs but as burdens to the capitalist machine.
The 2024 election brought this cruelty into sharp relief. The focus on economic issues like inflation was less about solutions and more about blaming the marginalized. Immigrants are scapegoated for rising costs; trans youth are blamed for societal decay. Meanwhile, corporations and the wealthy — the true beneficiaries of this system — are shielded from accountability. This is not accidental. It is the deliberate strategy of an ideology that thrives on division, one that keeps the majority fighting over scraps while the powerful consolidate their wealth and influence.
Harris’s loss, therefore, was not a referendum on her leadership or policies. It was a statement about the direction of this country, a confirmation that many Americans are willing to sacrifice equity and progress to preserve the old order. It is a devastating reminder that cruelty is not just a tool of power but a deeply ingrained value for those who fear change.
Yet, despite the bleakness of this moment, there remains a sliver of hope. Resistance to this authoritarian vision is not only possible but necessary. It must go beyond performative gestures and empty slogans. Real resistance requires targeted action — boycotting corporations that fund hate, supporting leaders who prioritize compassion, and holding systems accountable for their failures. This is not just about politics; it is about survival. If we fail to act, we risk losing not only our democracy but the very soul of our society.
The election of 2024 will be remembered as a turning point, a moment when America chose cruelty over compassion. But it is not the end of the story. The fight for equity and justice is far from over. For those of us who believe in the promise of a better future, this is a call to action. We must confront the systems that perpetuate oppression and build a movement that prioritizes humanity over profit.
America is at a crossroads. It can continue down the path of exclusion and dominance, or it can rise to meet the challenges of a changing world with courage and empathy. The choice is ours to make, and the stakes could not be higher. If we are to honor the sacrifices of those who have fought for a more compassionate society, we must act now — before it is too late.
References
New York Post. (2024, November 7). Black men explain why they ditched Democrats and voted for Trump: ‘He was authentic with the community.’ Retrieved from https://nypost.com
The Times. (2024, November 7). Why did Kamala Harris lose the election? Retrieved from https://www.thetimes.co.uk
Wall Street Journal. (2024). The new driving force of identity politics is class, not race. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Klein, E. (2023). Why America is stuck: The psychology of polarization. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com
Scholars Strategy Network. (2023). The myth of economic anxiety and the rise of white nationalism. Retrieved from https://www.scholars.org
Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York, NY: The New Press.
López, I. H. (2014). Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class. Oxford University Press.
